Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine whether students of Japanese language and literature in Japan can distinguish AI-generated haiku from human-written haiku. For each poem, you will rate several aspects and then judge whether it was written by a human or by AI.

I have read the purpose and wish to continue.

Participation & Consent

Estimated time: ~10–15 minutes
Responses are anonymous and used only for research.
You may stop at any time.

Date University name

I have read the information and consent to participate.

Background

Year & program

Familiarity with key elements (self-rating)

Kigo (season word)

High Medium Low

Kireji (cutting word)

High Medium Low

Instructions

You will see 1 haiku in random order (a mix of human and AI).
Do not use the internet or dictionaries while answering. Proceed in order.
If a theme is specified, also rate whether each haiku fits the theme.
There are no right answers; please answer honestly and consistently.

Theme (if any)

Per-Haiku Evaluation

Overall feedback (optional)

What cues helped you distinguish AI vs human? Which items were hard to rate, and why?

Thank you for your time and participation.

You may now close this page after exporting your answer in JSON format by cliking on the "Export JSON" button on your top right.